![]() The PR should be from your forks master branch. Those are nasty as you are essentially modifying the code as it was then while working your way up to the latest commit and every single one of the commit that you fix NEEDS to result in a fully compilable program. Then go to the main website of your fork and select the Create pull request option in the left menu. I would say that the ONE thing that I know for sure that a M would avoid is a rebase merge conflict. Allison Wheeler AugFor developers working in the public sector, leveraging secure version control systems like Git is essential to manage code and web content efficiently and safely. If your organization automatically squash merge, do R or M as it won't even show in the end. If your organization don't put any value in the feature branches, you can R or M. If multiple devs works on the same feature branch, never R. Mention a Jira issue key in the name to associate it to the said Jira issue. Enter a new branch name on the search box. Create a branch and associate it to a Jira issue: Select the master branch dropdown. The develop branch is created at the start of a project and is maintained throughout the development process, and contains pre-production code with newly developed features that are in the process of being tested. Right click on any existing commit to create a branch: A branch is a pointer to a specific commit in the repo, rather than making entire copies of the working. This is telling us that the last commit on the. ![]() Git should then display a message like: Successfully rebased and updated refs/head/feature-branch. You will start by running the following commands: git checkout feature-branch. From time to time a go around and delete those old branches but its a bit tedious. In this example, let’s say you want to rebase the feature branch onto the base of the main branch. If your organization care about keeping the history intact, don't R with upstream. Associate branches to a Jira issue by inserting the Jira issue key to the branch name when creating them. Whenever a PR is merged, the remote branch is automatically deleted from GitHub, but I am left with the local version of it. ![]() If your organization care about keeping the history of feature branches clean, don't M with upstream as it will become garbage. It's just different options that are open to you depending on your situation. There's no advantage/disadvantage for this just like these is no advantage/disadvantage to just rebase on top. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |